Investigating the Students’ Mathematical Fluency and Procedural Skills using P‑cube (P³) as an Authentic Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2026.1.13Keywords:
Authentic Assessment, Procedural Skills, Mathematical Fluency, Mathematics AssessmentAbstract
Mathematical fluency and procedural skills are essential for students to deepen their understanding of mathematics and apply knowledge to real-world situations. However, the 2022 PISA results revealed that the Philippines continues to perform poorly in mathematics, underscoring the need to strengthen these competencies among students. To address this, the researcher developed the P-cube(P³) assessment approach, which stands for Practice, Participate, and Portfolio. This study implemented P³ as an authentic assessment tool to describe the mathematical fluency and procedural skills of Grade 10-Astudents at Libertad National High School and to explore their perceptions of the assessment. Results indicated positive student responses, with only a few negative remarks. Procedural skills, measured through student scores, clustered around the mean, and the standard deviation was within acceptable limits, suggesting consistent performance levels. Few extreme scores were recorded. Interviews further revealed that students found mathematics more understandable and enjoyable through interactive and engaging activities. Although they encountered challenges such as multiple drills, extensive hands-on tasks, and complex problems, they reported improvements in problem-solving, communication, and creativity. These qualitative results aligned with strong performance on P-cubeactivities, though the study did not track improvement over time. Overall, the P-cubeassessment proved engaging and effective in promoting mathematical fluency and procedural understanding. Students expressed that learning mathematics—particularly topics like polynomial functions, became more enjoyable through this authentic, activity-based approach, making P³ a promising model for future classroom implementation.
Downloads
References
Adeoye, M. A., & Jimoh, H. A. (2023). Problem-Solving skills among 21st-Century learners toward creativity and innovation ideas.
Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.62708
Aiyub, A., Suryadi, D., Fatimah, S., Kusnandi, K., Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung, Indonesia, & Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-raniry, Banda Aceh,
Indonesia. (2024). Investigation of students’ mathematical thinking processes in solving non-routine number pattern
problems: A Hermeneutics Phenomenological study. In MATHEMATICS TEACHING RESEARCH JOURNAL (Vol. 16,
Issue 1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1427415.pdf
Alber, R. (2014). 6 Scaffolding strategies to use with your students. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessonssix-strategies-rebecca-alber
Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in Mixed Methods Research—Challenges and Benefits. Journal of
Education and Learning, 5(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288
Alkaabi, A. M., & Abdallah, A. K. (2024). Portfolio practices in the principal evaluation process: A qualitative case study. Heliyon,
10(21), e39467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39467
Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge
and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates work analysis and Standpoints. International Journal
of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: literature review. In The Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 19, Issue 1) [Journal-article].
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239945.pdf
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Von Münster-Kistner, C. F. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher
Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713057.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Andal, S. G. B., & Andrade, R. R. (2022). Exploring Students’ Procedural Fluency and Written Adaptive Reasoning Skills In
Solving Open-Ended Problems. International Journal of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 2(1).
https://doi.org/10.53378/352872
Anderson-Pence, K. L. (2017). Techno-Mathematical Discourse: a conceptual framework for analyzing classroom discussions. In
P. S. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), Education Sciences [Review]. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010040
Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and
Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336
Azi, Y. (2020). Scaffolding and the Teaching of writing within ZPD: Doing Scaffolded Writing (A short case Study). International
Journal of Linguistics, 12(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i3.14044
Bierer, S. B., Dallaghan, G. B., Borges, N. J., Brondfield, S., Fung, C. C., Huggett, K. N., Teal, C. R., Thammasitboon, S., &
Colbert, C. Y. (2025). Moving beyond simplistic research design in health professions education: What a One-Group
Pretest-Posttest design will not prove. MedEdPORTAL, 21, 11527. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11527
Blankman, R. (2024). What is procedural fluency in math? HMH. https://www.hmhco.com/blog/procedural-fluency-inmathematics?srsltid=AfmBOopkPbNS8iG9jCcGdyY2DskPk4OgfiYsMJtI228-up6fdRLFMn7t
Bures, E. M., Barclay, A., Abrami, P. C., & Meyer, E. J. (2013). The reality of assessing ‘authentic’ electronic portfolios: Can
electronic portfolios serve as a form of standardized assessment to measure literacy and self-regulated learning at the
elementary level? / L’évaluation d’e-portfolio «authentiques». Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(4).
https://doi.org/10.21432/t29g6w
Byers, T. (2016). A Quasi-Experimental and Single-Subject research approach as an alternative to traditional post-Occupancy
evaluation of learning environments. In SensePublishers eBooks (pp. 117–130). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-
1_9
Cartwright, K. (2018). Exploring mathematical fluency: Teachers’ conceptions and descriptions of students. In J. Hunter, P. Perger,
& L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the Mathematics
Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 202–209). Auckland: MERGA.
Cartwright, K. (2020). Analyzing students’ communication and representation of mathematical fluency during group tasks. The
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100821
Çelik, H. C. (2019). The effect of modelling, collaborative and game-based learning on the geometry success of third-grade students.
Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09983-3
Chaiklin, S. (2013). The zone of proximal Development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and Instruction. In Cambridge University
Press eBooks (pp. 39–64). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840975.004
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2015). Model eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted
mathematicians. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17 (1), 37–47Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive Statistics
for Summarising Data. In Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data (pp. 61–139).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5).
Crowe, A., (2022). https://www.prodigygame.com/main-en/blog/why-is-math-important
Dempsey, T. L. (2018). Handling the qualitative side of mixed methods research: a multisite, Team-Based High School Education
Evaluation study. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.mr.0039.1809
Dimatacot, G. T., & Parangat, K. B. (2022). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on the academic performance in mathematics of
junior high school students in the Philippines. International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, 9(2),
51–58. https://doi.org/10.22362/ijcert/2022/v9/i02/v9i0204
Dina, Z. H., Ikhsan, M., & Hajidin. (2019). The Improvement of Communication and Mathematical Disposition Abilities through
Discovery Learning Model in Junior High School. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 11–
22.
Ehrenfeld, N., & Horn, I. S. (2020). Initiating and responding: Two moves for supporting students in mathematical groupwork.
Cognition and Instruction, 38(4), 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1797624 (journal and year from
discourse/groupwork literature; URL via publisher DOI lookup.)
Ekmekci, A. (2013). Mathematical literacy assessment design: a dimensionality analysis of Programme for International Student
Assessment (PISA) mathematics framework. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/items/7d6a79eb-c014-4a24-82f4-
b28b2c35a4aa
Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in Numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous
spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
Esparcia, R., Piñero, B., & Futalan, M. C. (2024). Learners’ scaffolding techniques: Their advantages in learning mathematics.
Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0144
Fitzmaurice, O., O’Meara, N., & Johnson, P. (2021). Highlighting the relevance of mathematics to secondary school students – why
and how. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 07. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/10895
Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why High School Students Feel Mathematics Difficult? An Exploration of Affective Beliefs.
Pedagogy ofTeacher Education- Trends and Challenges.
Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). The Teacher-Centered and the Student-Centered: A comparison of two approaches. International Journal of
Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.61424/ijah.v1i1.7
Graven, M., & Stott, D. (2015). Conceptualising procedural fluency as a spectrum of proficiency. Proceedings of the 18th Annual
National Congress of the Association for Mathematical Education of South Africa (AMESA) (pp. 146–156).
Potchefstroom: North-West University
Grønli, K. M., Walgermo, B. R., Uppstad, P. H., & McTigue, E. M. (2025). Transforming teacher feedback: A checklist for assessing
and supporting reading skills, motivation and student agency in oral reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 82,
102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102377
Gudeta, D. (2022). Professional development through reflective practice: The case of Addis Ababa secondary school EFL in-service
teachers. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2030076
Hakim, U., Syamsurianti, S., Zaini, S. H. B., Bahri, A., & Suardi, S. (2025). Enhancing Student Engagement, Academic
Performance, and Character through Problem- and Project-Based Learning: A Cross-National Study. International Journal
of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.2
Halpin, S. N. (2024). Inter-Coder Agreement in Qualitative Coding: Considerations for its Use. In American Journal of Qualitative
Research (Vols. 8–8, Issue 3, pp. 23–43). https://www.ajqr.org/download/inter-coder-agreement-in-qualitative-codingconsiderations-for-its-use-14887.pdf
Hassan, I. Y. (2024). Linguistic opinions according to Al-Rawasi in the interpretations of Ibn Atiyya Al-Andalusi, Al-Qurtubi, and
Abu Hayyan Al-Andalusi. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.2.11
Helwig-Henseleit, R. (2025). Transforming maths Education with Vygotsky’s theories. Maths – No Problem! Maths Mastery for
Primary School Education. https://mathsnoproblem.com/blog/teaching-practice/bringing-lev-vygotsky-into-the-classroom
Hendriana, H., Putra, H. D., & Hidayat, W. (2019). How to design teaching materials to improve the ability of mathematical
reflective thinking of senior high school students in Indonesia? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112033
Hiltrimartin, C., & Pratiwi, W. D. (2025). Problem-solving skills among students on the topic of derivatives: Differences in the
changes of achievement emotions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2645.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16504no stable open URL—commonly available via academic libraries.)
Hintz, A., & Tyson, K. (2015). Complex listening in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(3), 29–34.
(Stable access typically via JSTOR/FLM site; add URL from your database or library system.) Hodaňová, J., & Nocar, D.
(2016). MATHEMATICS IMPORTANCE IN OUR LIFE. INTED Proceedings, 1, 3086–3092.
https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.0172
H, L. (2025). How to do thematic analysis — Delve. Delve. https://delvetool.com/blog/thematicanalysis-v1
Ho, T. M. P. (2020). Measuring conceptual understanding, procedural fluency and integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge
in mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 8(05), 1334–
1350. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v8i05.el02
Hojjat M., Mohsen K., Javad A. S. & Ghasem P. (2015). “The Effect of Computer Games on Speed, Attention and Consistency of
Learning Mathematics among Students” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume 176, Pages 419-424.
Hofer, S. I., & Reinhold, F. (2025). Scaffolding of learning activities: Aptitude-treatment-interaction effects in math? Learning and
Instruction, 99, 102177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102177
Hrmo, R., & Gonda, D., (2021). DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ ABSTRACT THINKING IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS. In A D a
L T a J O U R N a L O F I N T E R D I S C I P L I N a R Y R E S E a R C H (p. 1) [Journal-article].
https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/1201/papers/A_gonda.pdf
Hudesman, J., Crosby, S., Flugman, B., Issac, S., Everson, H., Center for the Advanced Study in Education, Clay, D. B., SEEK
Program, & New York City College of Technology. (2020.). Using formative assessment and metacognition to improve
student achievement. In Journal
Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual Knowledge OR Procedural Knowledge or Conceptual Knowledge AND Procedural Knowledge:
Why the Conjunction is Important to Teachers. ˜the œAustralian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 57–71.
https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.of Developmental Education (Vol. 37, Issue 1).
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067283.pdf
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
Kalobo, L. (2025). Basic School Leaders’ Continuous Professional Development for the 4IR: A Systematic Literature Review across
Africa. Athens Journal of Education, 12(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.12-2-6
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030
Lanya, H., Susiswo, S., Hidayanto, E., & Rahardjo, S. (2024). Fostering students’ potential understanding in mathematics learning:
Use of teacher questions in small-group discussion. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 2427–2440.
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2493
Li, L. (2023). Critical thinking from the ground up: teachers’ conceptions and practice in EFL classrooms. Teachers and Teaching,
29(6), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2191182
Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal,
19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-12-2018-0012
Lopez Jr., H. & Roble, D. (2022). “Challenges and Adaptive Strategies of Outof-Field Mathematics Teachers in the Province of
Misamis Oriental, Philippines.” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 3: 111-115. doi:
10.12691/education-10-3-1.
Luo, W., Hogan, D., Tan, L. S., Kaur, B., Ng, P. T., & Chan, M. (2014). Self-construal and students’ math self-concept, anxiety and
achievement: An examination of achievement goals as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 184–195.
doi:10.1111/ajsp.12058Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R., Sukri, A., & Handhika, J. (2021). Developing student’s metacognitive
ability in science through project-based learning with e-portfolio. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in
Education (IJERE), 10(3), 948. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21370
Luu, L. T. (2024). A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF REFLEX MATH ON THE PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM
OF SCHOOL ASSESSMENT (PSSA). In Dr. Atiba Griffith, Dr. Whitney Impellizeri, Dr. Ife Akinsheye Damon, & Dr.
Raymond Bandlow, A Dissertation [Thesis]. Gwynedd Mercy University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED662817.pdf
Main, P. (2023). Vygotsky’s Theory. Structural Learning. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/vygotsky-theory
Mcleod, S. (2025). Vygotsky’s Theory of Cognitive Development. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15680745
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual
model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789Namkung, J. M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The Relation Between
Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Performance among School-Aged Students: A Meta-Analysis. Review of
Educational Research, 89(3), 459–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494
Nardo, A. (2021). Exploring a Vygotskian theory of education and its evolutionary foundations. Educational Theory, 71(3), 331–
352. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12485
Ncube, M., & Luneta, K. (2025). Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual
understanding. Pythagoras, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815
Nurjanah, Jarnawi, & Wibisono, Y. (2021). The Effect of Hands-On and Computer-Based Learning Activities on Conceptual
Understanding and Mathematical Reasoning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 143-160.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1419a
Olazo, C. J. A. (2019). Sei Mathteach. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/401646405/Sei-Mathteach
Omda, S. E., & Sergent, S. R. (2024). Standard deviation. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574574/
Östergren, R., Träff, U., Elofsson, J., Hesser, H., & Samuelsson, J. (2023). Memorization versus conceptual practice with number
combinations: their effects on second graders with different types of mathematical learning difficulties. Scandinavian
Journal of Educational Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2211983
Palasi, S. M. S. (2025). EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL MATHEMATICS PROGRAM IN IMPROVING THE
PROFICIENCY OF LEARNERS IN MATHEMATICS. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(8), 361–459.
https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i08.016
Posamentier, A. S., Smith, B. S., & Stepelman, J. (2019). Teaching secondary mathematics: Teaching and enrichments units. Merrill
Prentice Hall.
Sbhatu, D. B., & Weldeana, H. N. (2017). Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among
Teacher Education College Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6).
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a
Servallos, N. J. (2023). PISA: Philippines 5 to 6 years behind. Philstar.com.
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/07/2317044/pisa-philippines-5-6-years-behind
Shaheen, M., Pradhan, S., & Ranajee, N. (2018). Sampling in qualitative research. In Advances in business information systems
and analytics book series (pp. 25–51). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5366-3.ch002
Shaw, R. L., Hiles, D. R., West, K., Holland, C., & Gwyther, H. (2018). From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a
fresh look at developing mixed design studies. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 226–244.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1515016
Siagian, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of learning materials oriented on Problem-Based Learning model to
improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and metacognition ability. International Electronic Journal of
Mathematics Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5717
Siegle, D. (2015). Likert scales. Educational Research Basics by Del Siegle.
https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/likert_scales/
Siller, H., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade six students’ mathematics
achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 20(2),
em2395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14153
Šliogerienė, J. (2016). Using portfolios to enhance self–regulated learning. Sustainable Multilingualism, 9, 186–204.
https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-2027.9.9
Smith, E. (2023). A Holistic Approach to Assessment for Students with Severe Learning Difficulties. Open Research Online (the
Open University). https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.00015d8d
Stanco, G. (2015). Using TIMSS 2007 data to examine STEM school effectiveness in an international context. In Boston College
Lynch School of Education Department of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation & Boston College
University Libraries, Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation [Thesis]. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-
05/Award_Choppin_using_TIMSS_data_Stanco.pd
Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning
outcomes and students’ attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153.
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169
Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education.
Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. SSRN
Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
Teig, N., Nilsen, T., & Hansen, K. Y., (2024). Effective and Equitable teacher practice in Mathematics and Science Education: A
Nordic perspective across time and groups of students. In J. Ainley, A. Alqataee, B. L. Chua, S. Howie, M. M. Isac, E.
Klemenˇciˇc-Mirazchiyski, E. Klieme, D. Lafontaine, F.-L. Lin, M. Lockheed, M. Miminoshvili, R. V. Olsen, C. Omoeva,
E. Papanastasiou, V. W. Plisko, D. Rutkowski, F. Salles, A. S. Hernandez, M. Sitek, . . . H. Wagemaker (Eds.), IEA
Research for Education (Vol. 14). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED660849.pdf Zhou, X. (2024). Sociocultural theory in early childhood education. Lecture
Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 51(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/51/20240981
Thoe, N. K., Jamaludin, J., Pang, Y. J., Choong, C., Lay, Y. F., Ong, E. T., Durairaj, K., Talib, C. A., & Chin, C. K. (2022).
Developing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge/Skills of Lifelong Learners from Basic to Advance Learning:
Exemplars, Challenges and Future Direction. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 14(1), 22.
https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v14i1.13164
Topçiu, M., & Myftiu, J. (2015). Vygotsky Theory on Social Interaction and its Influence on the Development of Pre-School
Children. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 4(1), 172.
https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v4i1.p172-179
Tukaryanto. (2015).Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa melalui Pendekatan Saintific Terintegrasi
pada Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan. 7(5),178-189.
Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135
Valerio, M. T. B. (2015). Filipino – English Code-Switching Attitudes and Practices and Their Relationship to English Academic
Performance among Freshman Students of Quirino State University. International Journal of English Language Teaching,
2(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v2n1p76
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292 [1]
Wakefield, D. V. (2000). Math as a second language. The educational forum. Taylor & Francis Group (Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 272-
279).
Webster, W. (2023). Sampling Methods, Types & Techniques - Qualtrics. Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com/articles/strategyresearch/sampling-methods/
Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., Aoyama, K., & Sugiman. (2019). Diagnosing Students’ Learning Difficulties in the
Eyes of Indonesian Mathematics Teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357-
364.https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364.
Woods, P. J., Copur-Gencturk, Y., Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2023). Examining the role of student-centered versus
teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138,
104415.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415.
Yaniawati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N. M., Pramiarsih, E. E., & Mariani, M. (2020). Integration of e-Learning for Mathematics on
Resource- based learning: Increasing mathematical Creative Thinking and Self-Confidence. International Journal of
Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 15(06), 60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11915
Zhou, X. (2024). Sociocultural theory in early childhood education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,
51(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/51/20240981
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jay Pee L. Manuta, Dr. Douglas A. Salazar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










.png)







