Investigating the Students’ Mathematical Fluency and Procedural Skills using P‑cube (P³) as an Authentic Assessment

Authors

  • Jay Pee L. Manuta Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7188-9635
  • Dr. Douglas A. Salazar State University – Iligan Institute of Technology, 9200 Iligan City Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2026.1.13

Keywords:

Authentic Assessment, Procedural Skills, Mathematical Fluency, Mathematics Assessment

Abstract

Mathematical fluency and procedural skills are essential for students to deepen their understanding of mathematics and apply knowledge to real-world situations. However, the 2022 PISA results revealed that the Philippines continues to perform poorly in mathematics, underscoring the need to strengthen these competencies among students. To address this, the researcher developed the P-cube(P³) assessment approach, which stands for Practice, Participate, and Portfolio. This study implemented P³ as an authentic assessment tool to describe the mathematical fluency and procedural skills of Grade 10-Astudents at Libertad National High School and to explore their perceptions of the assessment. Results indicated positive student responses, with only a few negative remarks. Procedural skills, measured through student scores, clustered around the mean, and the standard deviation was within acceptable limits, suggesting consistent performance levels. Few extreme scores were recorded. Interviews further revealed that students found mathematics more understandable and enjoyable through interactive and engaging activities. Although they encountered challenges such as multiple drills, extensive hands-on tasks, and complex problems, they reported improvements in problem-solving, communication, and creativity. These qualitative results aligned with strong performance on P-cubeactivities, though the study did not track improvement over time. Overall, the P-cubeassessment proved engaging and effective in promoting mathematical fluency and procedural understanding. Students expressed that learning mathematics—particularly topics like polynomial functions, became more enjoyable through this authentic, activity-based approach, making P³ a promising model for future classroom implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeoye, M. A., & Jimoh, H. A. (2023). Problem-Solving skills among 21st-Century learners toward creativity and innovation ideas.

Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.62708

Aiyub, A., Suryadi, D., Fatimah, S., Kusnandi, K., Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,

Bandung, Indonesia, & Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-raniry, Banda Aceh,

Indonesia. (2024). Investigation of students’ mathematical thinking processes in solving non-routine number pattern

problems: A Hermeneutics Phenomenological study. In MATHEMATICS TEACHING RESEARCH JOURNAL (Vol. 16,

Issue 1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1427415.pdf

Alber, R. (2014). 6 Scaffolding strategies to use with your students. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessonssix-strategies-rebecca-alber

Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in Mixed Methods Research—Challenges and Benefits. Journal of

Education and Learning, 5(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288

Alkaabi, A. M., & Abdallah, A. K. (2024). Portfolio practices in the principal evaluation process: A qualitative case study. Heliyon,

10(21), e39467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39467

Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge

and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates work analysis and Standpoints. International Journal

of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273

Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: literature review. In The Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 19, Issue 1) [Journal-article].

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239945.pdf

Amerstorfer, C. M., & Von Münster-Kistner, C. F. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher

Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713057.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057

Andal, S. G. B., & Andrade, R. R. (2022). Exploring Students’ Procedural Fluency and Written Adaptive Reasoning Skills In

Solving Open-Ended Problems. International Journal of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 2(1).

https://doi.org/10.53378/352872

Anderson-Pence, K. L. (2017). Techno-Mathematical Discourse: a conceptual framework for analyzing classroom discussions. In

P. S. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), Education Sciences [Review]. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010040

Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and

Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336

Azi, Y. (2020). Scaffolding and the Teaching of writing within ZPD: Doing Scaffolded Writing (A short case Study). International

Journal of Linguistics, 12(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i3.14044

Bierer, S. B., Dallaghan, G. B., Borges, N. J., Brondfield, S., Fung, C. C., Huggett, K. N., Teal, C. R., Thammasitboon, S., &

Colbert, C. Y. (2025). Moving beyond simplistic research design in health professions education: What a One-Group

Pretest-Posttest design will not prove. MedEdPORTAL, 21, 11527. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11527

Blankman, R. (2024). What is procedural fluency in math? HMH. https://www.hmhco.com/blog/procedural-fluency-inmathematics?srsltid=AfmBOopkPbNS8iG9jCcGdyY2DskPk4OgfiYsMJtI228-up6fdRLFMn7t

Bures, E. M., Barclay, A., Abrami, P. C., & Meyer, E. J. (2013). The reality of assessing ‘authentic’ electronic portfolios: Can

electronic portfolios serve as a form of standardized assessment to measure literacy and self-regulated learning at the

elementary level? / L’évaluation d’e-portfolio «authentiques». Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(4).

https://doi.org/10.21432/t29g6w

Byers, T. (2016). A Quasi-Experimental and Single-Subject research approach as an alternative to traditional post-Occupancy

evaluation of learning environments. In SensePublishers eBooks (pp. 117–130). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-

1_9

Cartwright, K. (2018). Exploring mathematical fluency: Teachers’ conceptions and descriptions of students. In J. Hunter, P. Perger,

& L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the Mathematics

Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 202–209). Auckland: MERGA.

Cartwright, K. (2020). Analyzing students’ communication and representation of mathematical fluency during group tasks. The

Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100821

Çelik, H. C. (2019). The effect of modelling, collaborative and game-based learning on the geometry success of third-grade students.

Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09983-3

Chaiklin, S. (2013). The zone of proximal Development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and Instruction. In Cambridge University

Press eBooks (pp. 39–64). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840975.004

Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2015). Model eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted

mathematicians. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17 (1), 37–47Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive Statistics

for Summarising Data. In Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data (pp. 61–139).

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5).

Crowe, A., (2022). https://www.prodigygame.com/main-en/blog/why-is-math-important

Dempsey, T. L. (2018). Handling the qualitative side of mixed methods research: a multisite, Team-Based High School Education

Evaluation study. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.mr.0039.1809

Dimatacot, G. T., & Parangat, K. B. (2022). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on the academic performance in mathematics of

junior high school students in the Philippines. International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, 9(2),

51–58. https://doi.org/10.22362/ijcert/2022/v9/i02/v9i0204

Dina, Z. H., Ikhsan, M., & Hajidin. (2019). The Improvement of Communication and Mathematical Disposition Abilities through

Discovery Learning Model in Junior High School. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 11–

22.

Ehrenfeld, N., & Horn, I. S. (2020). Initiating and responding: Two moves for supporting students in mathematical groupwork.

Cognition and Instruction, 38(4), 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1797624 (journal and year from

discourse/groupwork literature; URL via publisher DOI lookup.)

Ekmekci, A. (2013). Mathematical literacy assessment design: a dimensionality analysis of Programme for International Student

Assessment (PISA) mathematics framework. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/items/7d6a79eb-c014-4a24-82f4-

b28b2c35a4aa

Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in Numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous

spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288

Esparcia, R., Piñero, B., & Futalan, M. C. (2024). Learners’ scaffolding techniques: Their advantages in learning mathematics.

Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0144

Fitzmaurice, O., O’Meara, N., & Johnson, P. (2021). Highlighting the relevance of mathematics to secondary school students – why

and how. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 07. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/10895

Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why High School Students Feel Mathematics Difficult? An Exploration of Affective Beliefs.

Pedagogy ofTeacher Education- Trends and Challenges.

Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). The Teacher-Centered and the Student-Centered: A comparison of two approaches. International Journal of

Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.61424/ijah.v1i1.7

Graven, M., & Stott, D. (2015). Conceptualising procedural fluency as a spectrum of proficiency. Proceedings of the 18th Annual

National Congress of the Association for Mathematical Education of South Africa (AMESA) (pp. 146–156).

Potchefstroom: North-West University

Grønli, K. M., Walgermo, B. R., Uppstad, P. H., & McTigue, E. M. (2025). Transforming teacher feedback: A checklist for assessing

and supporting reading skills, motivation and student agency in oral reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 82,

102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102377

Gudeta, D. (2022). Professional development through reflective practice: The case of Addis Ababa secondary school EFL in-service

teachers. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2030076

Hakim, U., Syamsurianti, S., Zaini, S. H. B., Bahri, A., & Suardi, S. (2025). Enhancing Student Engagement, Academic

Performance, and Character through Problem- and Project-Based Learning: A Cross-National Study. International Journal

of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.2

Halpin, S. N. (2024). Inter-Coder Agreement in Qualitative Coding: Considerations for its Use. In American Journal of Qualitative

Research (Vols. 8–8, Issue 3, pp. 23–43). https://www.ajqr.org/download/inter-coder-agreement-in-qualitative-codingconsiderations-for-its-use-14887.pdf

Hassan, I. Y. (2024). Linguistic opinions according to Al-Rawasi in the interpretations of Ibn Atiyya Al-Andalusi, Al-Qurtubi, and

Abu Hayyan Al-Andalusi. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.2.11

Helwig-Henseleit, R. (2025). Transforming maths Education with Vygotsky’s theories. Maths – No Problem! Maths Mastery for

Primary School Education. https://mathsnoproblem.com/blog/teaching-practice/bringing-lev-vygotsky-into-the-classroom

Hendriana, H., Putra, H. D., & Hidayat, W. (2019). How to design teaching materials to improve the ability of mathematical

reflective thinking of senior high school students in Indonesia? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology

Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112033

Hiltrimartin, C., & Pratiwi, W. D. (2025). Problem-solving skills among students on the topic of derivatives: Differences in the

changes of achievement emotions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2645.

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16504no stable open URL—commonly available via academic libraries.)

Hintz, A., & Tyson, K. (2015). Complex listening in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(3), 29–34.

(Stable access typically via JSTOR/FLM site; add URL from your database or library system.) Hodaňová, J., & Nocar, D.

(2016). MATHEMATICS IMPORTANCE IN OUR LIFE. INTED Proceedings, 1, 3086–3092.

https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.0172

H, L. (2025). How to do thematic analysis — Delve. Delve. https://delvetool.com/blog/thematicanalysis-v1

Ho, T. M. P. (2020). Measuring conceptual understanding, procedural fluency and integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge

in mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 8(05), 1334–

1350. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v8i05.el02

Hojjat M., Mohsen K., Javad A. S. & Ghasem P. (2015). “The Effect of Computer Games on Speed, Attention and Consistency of

Learning Mathematics among Students” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume 176, Pages 419-424.

Hofer, S. I., & Reinhold, F. (2025). Scaffolding of learning activities: Aptitude-treatment-interaction effects in math? Learning and

Instruction, 99, 102177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102177

Hrmo, R., & Gonda, D., (2021). DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ ABSTRACT THINKING IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS. In A D a

L T a J O U R N a L O F I N T E R D I S C I P L I N a R Y R E S E a R C H (p. 1) [Journal-article].

https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/1201/papers/A_gonda.pdf

Hudesman, J., Crosby, S., Flugman, B., Issac, S., Everson, H., Center for the Advanced Study in Education, Clay, D. B., SEEK

Program, & New York City College of Technology. (2020.). Using formative assessment and metacognition to improve

student achievement. In Journal

Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual Knowledge OR Procedural Knowledge or Conceptual Knowledge AND Procedural Knowledge:

Why the Conjunction is Important to Teachers. ˜the œAustralian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 57–71.

https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.of Developmental Education (Vol. 37, Issue 1).

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067283.pdf

Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for

Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169

Kalobo, L. (2025). Basic School Leaders’ Continuous Professional Development for the 4IR: A Systematic Literature Review across

Africa. Athens Journal of Education, 12(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.12-2-6

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030

Lanya, H., Susiswo, S., Hidayanto, E., & Rahardjo, S. (2024). Fostering students’ potential understanding in mathematics learning:

Use of teacher questions in small-group discussion. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 2427–2440.

https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2493

Li, L. (2023). Critical thinking from the ground up: teachers’ conceptions and practice in EFL classrooms. Teachers and Teaching,

29(6), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2191182

Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal,

19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-12-2018-0012

Lopez Jr., H. & Roble, D. (2022). “Challenges and Adaptive Strategies of Outof-Field Mathematics Teachers in the Province of

Misamis Oriental, Philippines.” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 3: 111-115. doi:

10.12691/education-10-3-1.

Luo, W., Hogan, D., Tan, L. S., Kaur, B., Ng, P. T., & Chan, M. (2014). Self-construal and students’ math self-concept, anxiety and

achievement: An examination of achievement goals as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 184–195.

doi:10.1111/ajsp.12058Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R., Sukri, A., & Handhika, J. (2021). Developing student’s metacognitive

ability in science through project-based learning with e-portfolio. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in

Education (IJERE), 10(3), 948. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21370

Luu, L. T. (2024). A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF REFLEX MATH ON THE PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM

OF SCHOOL ASSESSMENT (PSSA). In Dr. Atiba Griffith, Dr. Whitney Impellizeri, Dr. Ife Akinsheye Damon, & Dr.

Raymond Bandlow, A Dissertation [Thesis]. Gwynedd Mercy University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED662817.pdf

Main, P. (2023). Vygotsky’s Theory. Structural Learning. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/vygotsky-theory

Mcleod, S. (2025). Vygotsky’s Theory of Cognitive Development. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15680745

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual

model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22.

https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789Namkung, J. M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The Relation Between

Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Performance among School-Aged Students: A Meta-Analysis. Review of

Educational Research, 89(3), 459–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494

Nardo, A. (2021). Exploring a Vygotskian theory of education and its evolutionary foundations. Educational Theory, 71(3), 331–

352. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12485

Ncube, M., & Luneta, K. (2025). Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual

understanding. Pythagoras, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815

Nurjanah, Jarnawi, & Wibisono, Y. (2021). The Effect of Hands-On and Computer-Based Learning Activities on Conceptual

Understanding and Mathematical Reasoning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 143-160.

https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1419a

Olazo, C. J. A. (2019). Sei Mathteach. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/401646405/Sei-Mathteach

Omda, S. E., & Sergent, S. R. (2024). Standard deviation. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574574/

Östergren, R., Träff, U., Elofsson, J., Hesser, H., & Samuelsson, J. (2023). Memorization versus conceptual practice with number

combinations: their effects on second graders with different types of mathematical learning difficulties. Scandinavian

Journal of Educational Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2211983

Palasi, S. M. S. (2025). EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL MATHEMATICS PROGRAM IN IMPROVING THE

PROFICIENCY OF LEARNERS IN MATHEMATICS. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(8), 361–459.

https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i08.016

Posamentier, A. S., Smith, B. S., & Stepelman, J. (2019). Teaching secondary mathematics: Teaching and enrichments units. Merrill

Prentice Hall.

Sbhatu, D. B., & Weldeana, H. N. (2017). Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among

Teacher Education College Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6).

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a

Servallos, N. J. (2023). PISA: Philippines 5 to 6 years behind. Philstar.com.

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/07/2317044/pisa-philippines-5-6-years-behind

Shaheen, M., Pradhan, S., & Ranajee, N. (2018). Sampling in qualitative research. In Advances in business information systems

and analytics book series (pp. 25–51). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5366-3.ch002

Shaw, R. L., Hiles, D. R., West, K., Holland, C., & Gwyther, H. (2018). From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a

fresh look at developing mixed design studies. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 226–244.

https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1515016

Siagian, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of learning materials oriented on Problem-Based Learning model to

improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and metacognition ability. International Electronic Journal of

Mathematics Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5717

Siegle, D. (2015). Likert scales. Educational Research Basics by Del Siegle.

https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/likert_scales/

Siller, H., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade six students’ mathematics

achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 20(2),

em2395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14153

Šliogerienė, J. (2016). Using portfolios to enhance self–regulated learning. Sustainable Multilingualism, 9, 186–204.

https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-2027.9.9

Smith, E. (2023). A Holistic Approach to Assessment for Students with Severe Learning Difficulties. Open Research Online (the

Open University). https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.00015d8d

Stanco, G. (2015). Using TIMSS 2007 data to examine STEM school effectiveness in an international context. In Boston College

Lynch School of Education Department of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation & Boston College

University Libraries, Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation [Thesis]. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-

05/Award_Choppin_using_TIMSS_data_Stanco.pd

Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning

outcomes and students’ attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153.

https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169

Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education.

Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. SSRN

Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Teig, N., Nilsen, T., & Hansen, K. Y., (2024). Effective and Equitable teacher practice in Mathematics and Science Education: A

Nordic perspective across time and groups of students. In J. Ainley, A. Alqataee, B. L. Chua, S. Howie, M. M. Isac, E.

Klemenˇciˇc-Mirazchiyski, E. Klieme, D. Lafontaine, F.-L. Lin, M. Lockheed, M. Miminoshvili, R. V. Olsen, C. Omoeva,

E. Papanastasiou, V. W. Plisko, D. Rutkowski, F. Salles, A. S. Hernandez, M. Sitek, . . . H. Wagemaker (Eds.), IEA

Research for Education (Vol. 14). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED660849.pdf Zhou, X. (2024). Sociocultural theory in early childhood education. Lecture

Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 51(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/51/20240981

Thoe, N. K., Jamaludin, J., Pang, Y. J., Choong, C., Lay, Y. F., Ong, E. T., Durairaj, K., Talib, C. A., & Chin, C. K. (2022).

Developing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge/Skills of Lifelong Learners from Basic to Advance Learning:

Exemplars, Challenges and Future Direction. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 14(1), 22.

https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v14i1.13164

Topçiu, M., & Myftiu, J. (2015). Vygotsky Theory on Social Interaction and its Influence on the Development of Pre-School

Children. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 4(1), 172.

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v4i1.p172-179

Tukaryanto. (2015).Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa melalui Pendekatan Saintific Terintegrasi

pada Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan. 7(5),178-189.

Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of

Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135

Valerio, M. T. B. (2015). Filipino – English Code-Switching Attitudes and Practices and Their Relationship to English Academic

Performance among Freshman Students of Quirino State University. International Journal of English Language Teaching,

2(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v2n1p76

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292 [1]

Wakefield, D. V. (2000). Math as a second language. The educational forum. Taylor & Francis Group (Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 272-

279).

Webster, W. (2023). Sampling Methods, Types & Techniques - Qualtrics. Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com/articles/strategyresearch/sampling-methods/

Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., Aoyama, K., & Sugiman. (2019). Diagnosing Students’ Learning Difficulties in the

Eyes of Indonesian Mathematics Teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357-

364.https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364.

Woods, P. J., Copur-Gencturk, Y., Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2023). Examining the role of student-centered versus

teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138,

104415.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415.

Yaniawati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N. M., Pramiarsih, E. E., & Mariani, M. (2020). Integration of e-Learning for Mathematics on

Resource- based learning: Increasing mathematical Creative Thinking and Self-Confidence. International Journal of

Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 15(06), 60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11915

Zhou, X. (2024). Sociocultural theory in early childhood education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,

51(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/51/20240981

Downloads

Published

2026-01-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Manuta, J. P., & Salazar, D. (2026). Investigating the Students’ Mathematical Fluency and Procedural Skills using P‑cube (P³) as an Authentic Assessment. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities (IJRSS) ISSN:2582-6220, DOI: 10.47505 IJRSS, 7(1), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2026.1.13